Wes' FNAL Talk

• muon pt on the event display
• s8 would start first with DM
• then add ν with next slide
• s11 add the leptons to the z* decay
  • Say that the dM sets the scale of the lepton pT
• s16 keep the larger legend on the right
• s24 emphasis how important this is. low pt electron fake modeling!
• s32 say that this is show this next week at Moriond for first time!
• s32 add another slide that adds on the ATLAS figure for comparison

• Start 3:05
• Kill 1st level of bullet points! / Check spacing on slides / Color theme
• Add B-tagging work
• Try to speak more loudly / Add Dynamic Range
• Put top quark FNAL
• s5 bullet galaxy?
• s6 gill the bottom plot / "wimp miracle"
• s8 would do DM first … Then add the ν line
• s9 easiest -> obvious
• s10 point out: (explain a bit more) red is neutrinos + jets
• s11 one scale sets multiple mass anoother scale sets the splitting
• s12 walk through plot on the right (Hard to read))
• s13 looks like other layers are there as well
• s14 not sure if you need the mll details. highlightthat this is the final var
• s15: hard to read /… point out gain mass splitting reach (PUT ON SLIDES)
• Dont say "a little bit"
• s18: again highlight the reduction in background
• s19 Event display: remind them of the "obvous seach" and then point out your extension
• s21: point out the gray is the most important part (CANT get form simulation)
• s23 does is not have the SF applied ? Maybe used post fit.
• s24 and s25 Walk through the plots gain.
• s26 Talk though: before and after /
• s27 skip
• Analysis was about 20 mins
• s29 talk about CMU building the modules
• s30 27₀₀₀ sesons
• s34 give some Big Picture conclusions about the irradiated modules.
• s35 10 min

• Clean up the format: remove the red borders (Read:https://cmu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CMU_INST/1feg4j8/alma991010814439704436 )
• Add intro slide with outline and brief bio: when you joined CMS what you worked on and when you moved to CERN ect.
• s1: Would add slide about the SM and how it has been so successful
• s2: Then can introduce DM as a big missing piece
  • The figure on left is more Dark Energy than DM. I would put another experimental evidence plot
• s3: Reccomend a thoeory slide on WiMPs instead of DM directly
  • (BTW: what are teh non-collider constraints on Higgsino and Wino-Bino models?)
• s6 Title: Searching for Dark Matter at teh LHC
• s7 Should check if there is a more recent version of this analysis
• s8; Should know what the blob on teh left is. (How was this sercher for before LHC?)
• s9: Too much text. Show in pictures examples of multiplets (know what sets M and ΔM)
• s11 too much text.
• s18 too much text. Show Z* decaying to leptons. Trick! -> Hard!
• s19 too much text. You should say this.. not write it
• s20: again you dont need the text. Give example of cuts to define Fake-enriched region (better slide spacing/layout)
• s21(better slide spacing/layout) (Maybe combine 20-21)
• s22: why MC so far off ?
• I would but 25 and 26 in backup
• s27: make a version of this that shows
  • the lep limit, old SOS + disappearing tracks, then
  • the lep limite, new SOS + disappearing tracks, then
  • the lep limit, new SOS + dis. tracks + isolated soft track.
  • explain the analyses in picture: eg s89 -95 here: https://cms-mgt-conferences.web.cern.ch/conferences/pres_display.aspx?cid=3612&pid=27647
• kill s28
• s31; Add slides
  • Discuss MAC produciton at CMU.
  • Then describe the Silicon lab at CERN
  • Then explain you went to cern and worked in SI lab. and outline what you did there.
  • Then go on to 32

Sent to Wes…

202503290844